Two ways email differs from traditional marketing

Posted in Deliverability with tags , , on 04.07.09 by Sven-Erik

Email is a fantastic tool. It is cheap to use, easy to collect, have powerful impact and is probably the best test & learn tool a marketeer can hold between his hands. It is used by most companies.

But there is one thing that comes to my mind after years and years of experience in this small and transparent industry.
Is email marketing, recognized as a full blooded marketing tool? Used by the same people that is responsible for your targeted DM´s, your positioning strategy or your online campaigns?

As Talefod wrote a couple of weeks ago on their webiste; Email Marketings greatest challenges is its price! Because it is so cheap companies have a tendensy to send out irrelevant mailing to the masses, not taking time to segment and tailer their emails to make them relevant.

Unlike traditional media, consumer behaviour when it comes to reading email newsletters is very different than what marketeers might be used to.

There are two major principal differences that you need to take into consideration when sending email to your customers.

1) Relevancy! One of the biggest buzz-words in the history of email marketing, but so very very true. Imagine what you would do if a company sends you two or maybe three irrelevant newsletters in a row. What is the likelyhood of you opening that fourth email? Probably not very high.

2) Email Fatigue! Your list will over time suffer from what we call email fatigue. Meaning more and more of your addresses will either be out of date (the recipient doesn´t use that email address any more) OR the recipient just doesn´t open you mailing. Unfortunately most of your subscribers don´t unsubscribe when they don´t find your mailings relevant anymore. They just delete it when it arrives.

Keep this in mind when you create your email strategy!

- Sven-Erik Gjertsen

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Microsoft to use Word engine to display HTML´s in Outlook 2010

Posted in Creative, Design, Copy & Test with tags , , , on 25.06.09 by Sven-Erik

It’s time for us to send the strongest message yet to Microsoft, and we need your help to get started. To make this happen, we’ve built fixoutlook.org.

Outlook´s broken - Let´s Fix it

Outlook´s broken - Let´s Fix it

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Remember to Welcome you new email customers!

Posted in Automated Emails, Event Trigger Marketing with tags , , , , , , , on 17.06.09 by Sven-Erik

Whether you sell a product or are looking to generate interest in your website or blog, getting people on your e-mail list is essential to building up a following you can interact with on a consistent basis.

Obviously if you don’t have a way for people to be placed on your e-mail list, do it now. You can offer a newsletter, updates, coupons or special offerings by asking people to sign up as a subscriber.

If you do have a system in place to have customers sign up for e-mails, the initial response you send to them might very well is the most important.

The “welcome” e-mail is probably the single greatest opportunity e-mail marketers have to engage subscribers and drive action.

A recent study, the Retail Welcome Email Benchmark Study  examined the welcome e-mail practices of 112 of the largest online retailers. Here is a list that summarizes four ways to squander that welcome e-mail opportunity:

1. You don’t send a welcome e-mail. Given the golden opportunity that welcome e-mails present marketers, it’s unfortunate so many still let the moment pass. Only 76 percent of retailers in the study send welcome e-mails. While that’s up from 72 percent in 2007 and 66 percent in 2006, it’s disheartening that more companies aren’t seizing this key marketing moment.

2. You take longer than 24 hours to deliver your welcome e-mail. First impressions can be everything — and a quickly delivered welcome e-mail is a critical element of this. Twenty-three percent of retailers took more than 24 hours to deliver their welcome e-mails, greatly diminishing their effectiveness. In this day and age, most consumers expect instantaneous response.
Seasoned marketers agree to get a welcome e-mail into new subscribers’ inboxes within 10 minutes. A solid majority of retailers (62 percent) already do this. If you’re in the minority and take more than 10 minutes, 24 hours or even a week to deliver your welcome, you risk unsubscribes and spam complainse because of your delays.

3. Your welcome e-mail doesn’t set expectations for future e-mails. While some subscription processes are rich with detailed descriptions and sample newsletters, most are not, which heightens the need for detailed welcome e-mails. However, retailers do a poor job of setting content and frequency expectations. Only 76 percent explain the benefits of being a subscriber, for example.

Regrettably, retailers have become less and less open about the frequency with which they’ll e-mail subscribers. In the study only 6 percent say — even in somewhat vague terms — how often subscribers should expect e-mails. That’s down from 13 percent in 2007 and 17 percent in 2006. Considering that over mailing is one of the top two reasons people unsubscribe, this failure to set volume expectations is a real liability.

4. Your welcome e-mail doesn’t have any calls to action. Welcome e-mails aren’t subscription confirmation e-mails; they’re your first opportunity to engage subscribers and demonstrate the value of your e-mails. The clearest indication that retailers are missing the point: only 87 percent include a link to their homepages. Providing that link is the most elementary avenue of engagement. Retailers miss many other opportunities to engage new subscribers with promotional, multichannel, loyalty and viral elements as well.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.